What is the difference between Subsidiary Alliance and the Doctrine of Lapse?

What is the difference between Subsidiary Alliance and the Doctrine of Lapse?

1–Subsidiary alliance :– It is a way of dominant ruling. In this very phenomenon the Indian ruler have to accept some British army men in their Indian force and also they have to give money and maintenance. 2–Doctrine of lapse :– It is also a way of dominant ruling. This system was introduced by Lord Dalhouise.

What is doctrine of Subsidiary Alliance?

An Indian ruler entering into a subsidiary alliance with the British had to accept British forces within his territory and also agreed to pay for their maintenance. The ruler would accept a British Resident in his state.

What were the main objectives of the Subsidiary Alliance and the Doctrine of Lapse?

Subsidiary Alliance: The Indian rulers who had entered into this military alliance with the British had to keep a British army in their state and bear the expenses of-the maintainance of that army. It was introduced by Lord Wellesley in 1798. Expansion of the British Empire in India was its main aim.

READ:   How can I start my career after civil engineering?

What was Subsidiary Alliance who introduced it class 8?

– The subsidiary alliance in India was planned by Lord Wellesley, the Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805. – The Subsidiary Alliance was a treaty between the British East India Company and the princely Indian states, which forced the Indian kingdoms to surrender their authority to the English.

What do you know about the doctrine of lapse?

One notable British technique was called the doctrine of lapse, first perpetrated by Lord Dalhousie in the late 1840s. It involved the British prohibiting a Hindu ruler without a natural heir from adopting a successor and, after the ruler died or abdicated, annexing his land.

Why the British introduced policies of Subsidiary Alliance and doctrine of lapse?

Lord Dalhousie framed and implemented the Doctrine of lapse to deal with the succession problem of Hindu states. According to the policy, the ruler who had accepted or was in an alliance with the Britishers would lose his territory if he dies without having an heir.

What is meant by Doctrine of Lapse?

The Doctrine of Lapse was introduced by Lord Dalhousie. According to this doctrine, if any Indian ruler dies without leaving a male heir, his kingdom would automatically pass over to the British.

READ:   Can a dentist pull 2 teeth at one time?

What was Doctrine of Lapse Upsc?

The Doctrine of Lapse was an annexation policy extensively applied by East India Company in India until 1859. The doctrine stated that any princely state under the vassalage of the company will how its territory annexed should the ruler of the said state fail to produce an heir.

What is the doctrine of lapse?

What is doctrine of lapse short answer?

The doctrine of lapse was a policy of annexation initiated by the East India Company in the Indian subcontinent about the princely states, and applied until 1859, two years after Company rule was succeeded by the British Raj.

What is Doctrine of Lapse Class 8?

What is subsidiary Alliance for Class 8 explain?

Subsidiary Alliance is a system developed by the East India Company. An Indian ruler entering into a subsidiary alliance with the British had to accept British forces in his territory and also agreed to pay for their maintenance. Hyderabad was also forced to cede territories on similar grounds.

What is the doctrine of lapse policy?

The doctrine of lapse policy was started by Lord Dalhousie according to which in order to continue dynastic rule in an Indian princely state, an Indian king had to produce an heir of his true blood, failing which his kingdom may be annexed by the British Empire. He could not adopt an heir for his kingdom.

READ:   Why was there no technological advancement in Westeros?

What is subsidiary alliance?

Subsidiary Alliance is a system developed by the East India Company. It solved the problem of ruling a nation which is under the rule of a king. An Indian ruler entering into a subsidiary alliance with the British had to accept British forces in his territory and also agreed to pay for their maintenance.

What is the difference between Treaty of Bassein and Treaty of subsidiary alliance?

Peshwa Baji Rao II signing of the Treaty of Bassein (Treaty of Subsidiary Alliance) with the British. The first major difference is doctrine of lapse deals with the non passing of royalty to adopted son/daughter of king/Queen as heredity was core crux of political system in Mughals era,Ancient India.

What were the provisions of the Subsidiary Treaty?

The provisions of the Subsidiary Treaty are: (a) An Indian ruler entering into Subsidiary Alliance with the British had to dissolve his own armed forces and accept British forces and a British Resident in his territory. (b) He had to pay for the British army’s maintenance.