Table of Contents
What is verdict on Ram Mandir?
The Supreme Court has delivered its judgment in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri masjid case. Here are the key takeaways from the SC verdict. The court rejected the claim and said there was evidence to show Hindus had unimpeded access to the parts of disputed site – thereby disqualifying the possession to be exclusive.
Is Ayodhya verdict justified?
Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict has not upheld the law, nor delivered justice.
Is Babri Masjid verdict correct?
Summary of the verdict The Court ruled that the 2010 Allahabad High Court’s decision, division of the disputed land was incorrect. The Court ruled that the Demolition of the Babri Masjid and the 1949 desecration of the Babri Masjid was in violation of law.
Is Ram Mandir verdict right?
The Supreme Court, on October 16, 2019, concluded hearings in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya and reserved its judgment, which was passed on November 9. The apex court, in a unanimous verdict, gave the ownership of the disputed 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya to the Ram Janmabhoomi trust.
Who gave the Ram Mandir Judgement?
Ayodhya: Ram Mandir timeline. The five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court led by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi (now retired) had on November 9, 2019 unanimously delivered its verdict that the land in Ayodhya where Babri Masjid once stood, belongs to Ram Lalla.
Who gave the Judgement of Ram Mandir?
What was the Supreme Court’s verdict on the Ayodhya case?
On 9 November 2019, the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, announced their verdict; it vacated the previous decision and ruled that the land belonged to the government based on tax records. It further ordered the land to be handed over to a trust to build the Hindu temple.
What is the Ayodhya dispute all about?
The dispute is focused on a plot of land in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, which is regarded among the Hindus to be the birthplace of the Hindu deity Ram. According to some beliefs, it was originally the site of a Hindu temple that was demolished to construct a mosque known as Babri Masjid.
Who was the custodian of Ayodhya?
A similar suit was filed shortly after but later withdrawn by Paramhans Das of Ayodhya. In 1959, the Nirmohi Akhara, a Hindu religious institution, filed a third title suit seeking direction to hand over the charge of the disputed site, claiming to be its custodian.
When was the Allahabad High Court verdict on land title case?
A subsequent land title case was lodged in the Allahabad High Court, the verdict of which was pronounced on 30 September 2010.