Table of Contents
Can you prove a fact?
In court, it’s not enough to know a fact – you have to be able to prove it. That means you have to be able to convince a jury or a judge that the fact is most likely true. Proving a fact requires evidence – something reliable to help convince the jury or judge.
Can you prove or disprove?
You cannot disprove a proof. Instead, what you are doing is proving that said proof is not a proof. And yes, there are generally many ways to prove something. At the simplest, most things can be proven directly, by induction, or by contradiction.
What is it called when you can’t prove or disprove something?
Things which cannot be proven/verified or disproven/falsified are then called metaphysics or metaphysical. Pejoratively they might be called ‘unscientific’, ‘philosophy’ ‘Untestable’ is less pejorative and leans towards the one-sided ‘unverifiable’.
Do facts really exist?
Because much like Santa Claus and unicorns, facts don’t actually exist. At least not in the way we commonly think of them. We think of a fact as an irrefutable truth. According to the Oxford dictionary, a fact is “a thing that is known or proved to be true.” And where does proof come from?
Can you prove something that doesn’t exist?
Absence of evidence is not Evidence of absence . There is the mistake of thinking that there are only two alternatives of a false dilemma: Premise 1:Either X exists or X does not Exist. Premise 2:You cannot prove that X does not exist.
Can you prove a negative in logic?
Yes, Virginia, you can prove a negative, and it’s easy, too. For one thing, a real, actual law of logic is a negative, namely the law of non-contradiction. This law states that that a proposition cannot be both true and not true. Nothing is both true and false.
Is it possible to prove that something exists using logic?
If you mean: ‘showing that it is a logical truth that something exists’, then the answer is no, or almost no. If a is an individual constant of given logical language, a = a is a logical truth, and so is the existential sentence ∃ x x = a – which effectively say that a exists.
Is it impossible to know anything at all?
This doesn’t mean it’s impossible to know anything at all. To the contrary, in many ways, scientific knowledge is the most “real” knowledge that we can possibly gain about the world. But in science, nothing is ever proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. As Einstein himself once said:
Do you need to prove things intellectually?
When it comes to proof, understand that all proofs are justifications. They don’t mean anything until you see the Reality. When you KNOW experientially, you don’t need to prove things intellectually. You don’t need to prove your experience, only protect it from senseless arguments. Explaining the Knowing logically is intellectual.
How can math prove the existence of something?
Every theory (including math and logical ones) can prove the existence of something only in the context of the axioms presupposed by the theory itself. The same for the deductive arguments about the existence of God; see e.g. Spinoza’s Ethics : it deduces the existence of God from axioms and definitions.