Do atheists have a basis for morality?

This leads them to the conclusion that an objective source of morality must stand apart from, and above, humans. That source, they say, is God. Since atheists, reject God, atheists can have no basis for morality.

How do atheists react to right and wrong?

Even atheists react to this inherent knowledge of right and wrong, some even to the extent of living exemplary lives. C.S. Lewis put it this way: C.S. Lewis described this well. He noted that if a man sees another in danger, the first instinct is to rush to help ( altruism ).

Does morality exist without God?

If God is merely an agent advocating some universal morality, then morality exists independently of God and, given enough time, humans could discover it through reasoning. In this case, we would not need God—the only role for God would be to help speed up the process of discovery. God would be unnecessary.

Is God’s morality objective?

Some theists do not attempt to claim that divine morality is objective. Instead, they accept that God’s morality is inherently subjective and arbitrary, but there are fatal problems with this position too. The first problem is we have to decide which god we should take our morality from (more properly, which god and which religion).

Why do we have morality in the first place?

However, in the atheist’s worldview there is no satisfactory answer as to why we have morality in the first place. Those who deny God can adhere to good moral principles, but when God is removed from the equation we are left without a source of understanding what good moral principles are.

Is God the source of objective morality?

And theists who argue that God is the source of objective morality must be wrong. Some theists do not attempt to claim that divine morality is objective. Instead, they accept that God’s morality is inherently subjective and arbitrary, but there are fatal problems with this position too.

How do New Atheists use the Natural Sciences in their arguments?

The New Atheists make substantial use of the natural sciences in both their criticisms of theistic belief and in their proposed explanations of its origin and evolution. They draw on science for recommended alternatives to religion.

Is there a connection between religion and morality?

Although there is no shortage of lively polemic, scientific investigations of the connection between religion and morality have so far produced mixed results. The interpretive difficulties are exacerbated by imprecise conceptions both of “religion” and “morality.”

Do atheists have implicit associations with immorality?

In a series of compelling recent studies, Gervais and colleagues (Gervais, Shariff, & Norenzayan, 2011; see also Gervais, 2011, 2013a, 2014a; Gervais & Norenzayan, 2012b, 2013) have demonstrated strong implicitassociations of atheists with immorality.

How do people take or leave religious morality?

Basically, people take or leave religious morality according to some internal moral compass they already have. They might even choose which church to go to, according to how well the teachings of that church match up with what they feel is right or wrong.