Has there ever been technocracy?

The former government of the Soviet Union has been referred to as a technocracy. Soviet leaders like Leonid Brezhnev often had a technical background. In 1986, 89\% of Politburo members were engineers.

What are the arguments for democracy?

(i) A democratic government is a better government because it is a more accountable form of government. (ii) Democracy improves the quality of decision-making. (iii) Democracy provides methods to deal with differences and conflicts. (iv) Democracy enhances the dignity of citizens.

Which is the strongest argument for democracy?

Answer

• IT PROMOTES EQUALITY AMONG CITIZENS.
• IT ENHANCES THE DIGNITY OF AN INDIVIDUAL.
• IT ENSURES BETTER QUALITY DECISIONS.
• IT PROVIDES A ROOM FOR CORRECTING MISTAKES.
• IT REDUCES THE CHANCES OF CONFLICTS AMONG CITIZENS.

How democracy is based on consultation and discussion?

Consultation and discussion help democracy prosper. A democratic decision always involves many persons discussions and meetings. When a number of people put their heads together they are able to point out possible mistakes in any decision. This reduces the chances of rash or irresponsible decisions.

What government did Aristotle believe in?

Aristotle considers constitutional government, in which the masses are granted citizenship and govern with everyone’s interest in mind, one of the best forms of government. It combines elements of oligarchy and democracy, finding a compromise between the demands of both the rich and the poor.

What is epistocracy and how does it work?

Epistocracy is a system in which the votes of people who can prove their political knowledge count more than the votes of people who can’t. In other words, it’s a system that privileges the most politically informed citizens. Brennan’s proposal sounds like a grandiose troll, but it’s not.

Should we replace democracy with an “epistocracy?

According to Brennan, we’d be better off if we replaced democracy with a form of government known as “epistocracy.” Epistocracy is a system in which the votes of people who can prove their political knowledge count more than the votes of people who can’t.

Is Singapore a technocracy or epistocracy?

When you look at Singapore, I would call that more of a technocracy than an epistocracy, but you do have a system that is being run by elites for the common good. Is there any fair way to determine who is and isn’t competent?