How effective is lamellar armor?

The leather lamellar proved to be particularly effective only when defending against bolts and arrows. The steel lamellar proved to be considerably effective against slashing, thrusting and piercing attacks but was comparatively weak against bludgeoning attacks.

When was lamellar armor used?

In ancient China, lamellar armour appeared by the 5th century BC. It consisted of individual armour pieces (lamellae, lamella singular) that were either riveted or laced together to form a suit of armour. Iron helmets constructed with multiple lamellae began to replace the one piece bronze helmets of old.

Did Vikings wear lamellar armour?

If lamellar armor was ever used, it was most likely rare and only worn by the richest and most elite Vikings/Norsemen. The Vikings did not invent very much when it came to warfare and battle.

How thick are lamellar plates?

These plates are quite durable, and are 2” wide x 3.375” long, 0.160” thick, weighing 1.55# per 50.

How many plates does lamellar have?

approximately 15 plates are required per foot of length. Each row adds about 2″ of height to the laced assembly in a row. approximately 15 plates are required per foot of length.

What is the difference between scale armor and lamellar armor?

Unlike scale armour, which it resembles, lamellar armour is not attached to a cloth or leather backing (although it is typically worn over a padded undergarment). In Asia, lamellar armor eventually overtook scale armour in popularity as lamellar restricted the user’s movements much less than scale armour.

What is the earliest evidence of lamellar armor?

The earliest evidence for lamellar armour comes from sculpted artwork of the Neo-Assyrian Empire in the Near East . Lamellar armour consists of small platelets known as “lamellae” or “lames”, which are punched and laced together, typically in horizontal rows.

Was Byzantine lamellar armor superior to mail armor?

Recent studies by Timothy Dawson of the University of New England, Australia, suggest that Byzantine lamellar armour was significantly superior to mail armour. Lamellar armour reached Japan around the 5th century, predating the rise of the samurai caste.

Was Assyrian armor scale or lamellar?

Among finds of Assyrian armour (often individual or unconnected scales), there are examples that can clearly be classified as scale armour as well as others that appear to be lamellar, and there exist a large number of finds whose function has proven difficult to determine. The extent to which either type was used is a debated topic.