What did David Bohm think of Krishnamurti?

What did David Bohm think of Krishnamurti?

Was Krishnamurti a happy person? Bohm seemed puzzled by my question. “That’s hard to say,” he replied. “He was unhappy at times, but I think he was pretty happy overall.

What is the meaning of love according to Krishnamurti?

Krishnamurti: Thought in its very nature is divisive. It is thought that seeks pleasure and holds it. It is thought that cultivates desire. Love is not pleasure and pain, nor hate nor violence in any form.

What is reality Jiddu Krishnamurti?

It is verily the observed. This is an entirely new meaning of Reality which Krishnamurti brings to us. Reality is what the thought of man has put together.

What is Bohm theory?

Bohm advanced the view that quantum physics meant that the old Cartesian model of reality – that there are two kinds of substance, the mental and the physical, that somehow interact – was too limited. To complement it, he developed a mathematical and physical theory of “implicate” and “explicate” order.

READ:   What is the word limit for assignment?

What is dialogue by David Bohm?

Bohm Dialogue (also known as Bohmian Dialogue or “Dialogue in the Spirit of David Bohm”) is a freely flowing group conversation in which participants attempt to reach a common understanding, experiencing everyone’s point of view fully, equally and nonjudgmentally. This can lead to new and deeper understanding.

Did Krishnamurti get married?

In 1921 Krishnamurti fell in love with Helen Knothe, a 17-year-old American whose family associated with the Theosophists.

What happened to David Bohm?

Bohm, an American-born physicist who taught at the University of London for 22 years, died Tuesday. He was 74 years old. A colleague, Basil Hiley, said Mr. Bohm died of a heart attack.

What are the basic conditions that are necessary for dialogue according to Bohm?

The essential condition for a dialogue in Bohm’s sense is an attitude of openness and mindful perception without judgment. The attention in a dialogue must be on the observation and communication of what is happening in the group and within oneself when things are expressed and views made known.

READ:   Can you buy laptop from other countries?

How does Bohm’s approach to dialogue create shared meaning?

Collective Communication Bohm’s conception and process aspired to bring the human project of sharing meaning, values and learning forward by introducing practices or ways of being with the dialogue process that interrupted conventional practice at that time.

What is dialogue David Bohm?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Bohm Dialogue (also known as Bohmian Dialogue or “Dialogue in the Spirit of David Bohm”) is a freely flowing group conversation in which participants attempt to reach a common understanding, experiencing everyone’s point of view fully, equally and nonjudgmentally.

Who was Krishnamurti to David Bohm?

I may have had the idea before in a very germ form” – David Bohm But to summarize it coincisely, Krishnamurti was Bohm’s greatest influence and both men were clearly deeply concerned about the furture of humanity and the source of humanity’s incoherence.

What is the background of David Bohm’s work?

David Bohm: The background is that in my work in physics I was always interested in the general philosophical questions as they related to physics, and more generally, universally as it might relate to the whole constitution of nature and of man.

READ:   Where can I sell my poetry online?

Where did KK Krishnamurti work?

He left the US to work in Brazil and Israel, and later settled in London as professor of theoretical physics at Birkbeck College. The meetings with Krishnamurti became legendary and gave renewed urgency to the term “dialogue” as a fundamental of Krishnamurtian teaching.

What is the relationship between Dave and Krishnaji like?

Krishnaji, as always when he was alone with Dave, was warm and affectionate and asked him, “David, please come as often as you can to Brockwood”. And Dave assured him he would do so. This doesn’t seem to me to indicate the break between them that Peat writes of in the book and that Stephen quotes in his review.”