What is the problem with omnipotence?
The general problem is this: The fact that it is logically possible that some being perform a specified task (the task itself does not contain a contradiction) does not guarantee that it is logically possible for an omnipotent being to perform that task.
Is omnipotence the ability to do anything?
Principles of Omnipotence To give an illustration, omnipotence is the description of everything, including every possible, impossible, beyond notions of infinity. Omnipotence can do the impossible such as “bigger than infinity”, “making a squared circle” or even “transcending itself.”
What does not omnipotent mean?
Theological Theory For example, for God to be God, he would need to have supreme power (omnipotence); if he was not omnipotent, he wouldn’t be qualified to be God. The same line of thinking also applies for the other attributes, like omniscience and omnipresence.
Is there anything beyond omnipotence?
Beyond Omnipotent means to have power beyond absolute. Beyond Omnipotent can do anything and everything. It is the power to be Beyond All-Powerful. There is only one Omnipotent Being and Beyond Omnipotent signifies that point.
Are humans omnipotent?
Abstract. An omnipotent being would be a being whose power was unlimited. The power of human beings is limited in two distinct ways: we are limited with respect to our freedom of will, and we are limited in our ability to execute what we have willed.
Can an omnipotent being do anything logically possible?
And, yes, an omnipotent being can, by definition, do anything logically possible. And, yes, an omnipotent being can, by definition, do anything logically possible. — PoeticUniverse
Did Descartes believe in omnipotence?
Descartes famously answered ‘yes’. That is, Descartes thought an omnipotent being could do literally anything at all – including making a stone heavier than he can lift, and lifting it and other apparently impossible things, such as creating oneself.
Is there a moment when anything is impossible to lift?
There is no impossibility for an omnipotent being, not at any moment of such existence. Therefore, there could never be a time/moment when anything (a stone) is impossible (unable to lift). The premise is illogical and any conclusions in support of such can only express the deficiency in one’s reasoning.