What will be the output of the following if m 5 and n 2?

What will be the output of the following if m 5 and n 2?

We have m-=n; That is m=m-n. We have m=5 and n=2. Therefore, new value of m is 5-2=3 and the new value of n is still 2.

What will be the result of ++ m n/m ++ if M 9 & N 5?

According to the theories in textbooks, answer for this expression would be 26. Pre-increment (++m) is performed and is reflected immediately in the expression. So, new value of m = 11.

What is the statement n += 4 equal to?

The statement n += 4 is equivalent to: n=n+4. n+1.

READ:   What is the hardest jump in ice skating?

What is the difference between and == in Java?

The ‘==’ operator checks whether the two given operands are equal or not….What is the difference between = (Assignment) and == (Equal to) operators.

= ==
It is used for assigning the value to a variable. It is used for comparing two values. It returns 1 if both the values are equal otherwise returns 0.

What is the value of a m n?

(am)n = (an)m = a. am. an = a. a-m = 1/a.

What should be added get 5 9?

71/63 must be added to -4/7 to get 5/9.

What does a M/A N = A(M-N) mean?

4. a m / a n = a (m-n) says that when you take a number, a, and multiply it by itself m times, then divide that product by a multiplied by itself n times, it’s the same as a multiplied by itself m-n times.

How to reach n using m*2 operations?

1) If m is less than 0 and n is greater than 0, then not possible. 2) If m is greater than n, then we can reach n using subtractions only. 3) Else (m is less than n), we must do m*2 operations. Following two cases arise.

READ:   How profitable is pig farming in Philippines?

How many Mn are in 1 n?

How many MN in 1 N? The answer is 1.0E-6. We assume you are converting between meganewton and newton. You can view more details on each measurement unit: MN or N. The SI derived unit for force is the newton.

How do you prove the inequality n2 – 2n – 1?

The inequality can easily be proved without induction, as n2 −2n−1 = (n−1)2 −2 ≥ (3− 1)2 −2 = 2 for n ≥ 3. so your inductive step is formally right, but does not use the